The network giant reports Wednesday night after the close.
Cisco needs to generate revenue growth eventually.
The Dividend yield at 3.6% will attract yield fans, BUT dividend dollars as % of free-cash-flow now over 60%.
Did Cisco not have an incentive stock options last quarter?
Cisco Systems (CSCO), the networking giant and one of the mom-mo names of the late 1990's that created tremendous value for shareholders, will report their fiscal Q4 '17 earnings after the bell Wednesday night, August 16, 2017.
Analyst consensus is expecting a little over $12 bl in revenue which is expected to generate $0.61 in earnings per share for year-over-year declines of -5% and -3% respectively.
And therein lies the tale of Cisco: all those supposed bolt-on acquisitions, paid for with the incentive stock option crack, that - as Mr. Buffett puts it so succinctly - is a perfect example of "buying high and selling low" all of which has yet to generate any kind of meaningful revenue or net income growth, outside of share purchases to offset the dilution and add barely positive EPS growth.
In the earnings preview from last quarter, the table's showing the long-term growth of revenue, operating income and EPS were very telling.
The chart of Cisco last quarter was actually looking a little better, and with a trade over the late 2007 high of $33.50 - $34, you'd get a better looking chart which might indicate a turn in the fundamentals.
However, last quarter's earnings report tanked the stock - again - and Cisco has languished in the low $30's once more.
The daily chart shows that Cisco has regained its 200-day moving average just prior to earnings so perhaps there is good news ahead.
Let's look at the numbers:
Q4 '17 est
Q3 '17
Q2 '17
Q1 '17
2019 EPS est
$2.56
$2.55
$2.60
$2.60
2018 EPS est
$2.45
$2.45
$2.49
$2.49
2017 EPS est
$2.38
$2.38
$2.38
$2.37
2019 est EPS gro rt
4%
4%
4%
4%
2018 est EPS gro rt
3%
3%
5%
5%
2017 est EPS gro rt
1%
1%
1%
0%
2019 P.E
13(x)
12(x)
13(x)
12(x)
2018 P.E
13(x)
13(x)
13(x)
12(x)
2017 P.E
13(x)
13(x)
14(x)
13(x)
2019 rev est ($'s bl's)
$49.3
$49.4
$50.8
$50.9
2018 rev est
$48.2
$48.4
$49.5
$49.5
2017 rev est
$47.9
$47.9
$48.4
$48.3
2019 est rev gro rt
2%
2%
3%
3%
2018 est rev gro rt
1%
1
2%
2%
2017 est rev gro rt
-3%
-3%
-2%
-2%
Source: Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S consensus estimates as of 8/15/17
Note how EPS and revenue estimates continue to slowly get revised lower
Estimated forward revenue and EPS growth is expecting 0% revenue growth on 3% EPS growth for the next three years.
That's not great, but you could make a case the stock is priced for it.
Analysis/Conclusion
To avoid writing War & Peace, here are a few positives and negatives to listen for in the call Wednesday night. However as of yet there is no sign of a turn yet for Cisco revenue growth, and I think that is what matters:
1.) Expect more layoffs Wednesday night, which has allowed Cisco to expand it operating margin to the best level since 2004 per one sell-side analyst. (Jefferies)
Here's a quick table of Cisco's operating margin for the April quarter the last 5 years:
Cisco Op Mgn
y/y chg
4/17
32%
+235 bp's
4/16
30%
+134 bp's
4/15
29%
+0.53
4/14
28%
-0.16%
4/13
28%
Source: internal spreadsheet
Unfortunately the margins are coming at the expense of Cisco employees, but without revenue growth, Cisco has to do something to drive EPS growth
2.) The Service provider market is still weak, down 10% in the April quarter. Let's see if that has changed. Revenue guidance was cut for the August '17 quarter.
3.) Security and Software segment, which I thought could be a secular growth area for Cisco was rather weak in q3 '17. Let's see if that changes.
One ambiguous positive for Cisco is cash-flow "ex-cash" at 6(x) cash-flow and 13(x) free-cash-flow ex-the balance sheet cash. Cisco has a 3.6% dividend yield BUT the dividend dollars as a percentage of free-cash-flow has risen to 62% which should tell readers that it is taking more and more free-cash to finance the dividend and with all the dilution, if Cisco doesn't start growing revenue and cash-flow, the road ahead will end badly. (Not a reason to panic yet, but cash-flow growth has disappeared with revenue growth.)
One client remains long one position from June, 1997 in their account. Cisco was a great company but the stock needs to demonstrate some form of revenue growth before getting interested again in any size.
Disclosure:I am/we are long CSCO.
I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Options are excellent tools for both position trading and risk management, but finding the right strategy is key to using these tools to your advantage. Beginners have several options when choosing a strategy, but first you should understand what options are and how they work. An option gives its holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell the underlying asset at a specified price on or before its expiration date. There are two types of options: a call, which gives the holder the right to buy the option, and a put, which gives its holder the right to sell the option. A call is in-the-money when its strike price (the price at which a contract can be exercised) is less than the underlying price, at-the-money when the strike price equals the price of the underlying and out-of-the-money when the strike price is greater than the underlying. The reverse is true for puts. When you buy an option, your level of loss is limited to the option’s price, or premium. When you sell a na...
By Christopher Speetzen Seeking alpha Summary Hibbett Sports trades at a steep discount to book value. It operates in a difficult sporting goods market. Can it survive the Amazon economy? Hibbett Sports, Inc. (NASDAQ: HIBB ) is a small-cap sporting goods retailer operating retail stores in small- to mid-sized markets mainly in the Southeast, Southwest, Mid-Atlantic and the Midwest. Like practically all brick-and-mortar retailers over the last year, its stock has been pummeled, dropping from around $40 a year ago to ~$10 after earnings were reported Friday, August 18 th . The main question to ask is whether this drop is valid or not and whether the stock presents an opportunity at the present price. Its second-quarter results were pretty dismal: Loss of $0.15 per share. Comparable store sales decreased 11.7%. Net sales for the 13-week period ended July 29, 2017, decreased 9.2% to $188.0 million compared with $206.9 million for the 13-week period ended July 30, ...
